![]() According to, an estimate of 94.25% global users can surely use WebP and see it’s images, the rest of the minority will not be able to see them. What are the problems with WebP Optimization?Īs it is a new file format, developed about ~10 years ago, very old browsers and systems might not support it. This means Google means business about implementing Webp. So we can see that Google implements it’s own recommendations, and it always told us that it’s own website also compete for SEO among the web. Google was offering multiple responsive options to users in WebP. We went to their Store and looked at images uploaded to their products, such as the Google Pixel 6. We stalked Google to see if they used their own file formats, and Bingo! They did use them. You will need to play with the quality (read the settings) and maybe you can achieve the file size you want. CloudConvert doesn’t compress images by default. We like Online-Convert, CloudConvert and SwooshApp. Is there an online tool I can use to convert my images? You will have to use commands to do this (this is slightly complex and you can take your dev’s help). Check the details on their list of precompiled tools, and you can use this guideline to learn more about how to convert your images. Yes, Google offers a tool that you can convert your images. Can I bulk convert my images using some method? Users using 23.1 and before, can download a plugin here and then open, create and output images in WebP. Photoshop now offers native support for WebP images since Photoshop version 23.2. How do I convert images to WebP in Photoshop? To convert using these tools, simply upload your image to these websites and press convert, and voila! Your image is ready for downloading (and reuploading for use).If you want to convert online, you can see the list of tools in 3rd question below.If you want to convert your files using Adobe Suite, look at the question below for instructions.You need to tell your web designer to output all web images in WebP for your website. Have a look at the following table for the comparison between the file extensions: Yes, this is worth looking into immediately. ![]() However, a JPEG image, when converted to WebP has it’s size reduced by 26-30% compared, and a PNG 3 times (if it’s a similar transparent image).Ĭheck Google’s tests here. JPEGs are better and perform much better than PNGs on web pages. Yes, PNGs are most sexy, however, they are highest in loading times in web browsers, and hence worst in search performance. Why? Well, increased performance in Search Engines can lead to better rankings, more traffic, more customers and higher sales. If you care about increasing your sales and revenue, you should care about WebP. It offers better loading times while keeping the following features: Google created WebP to replace other file formats like JPEG, PNG etc. This is where WebP image optimization comes in to gives JPG, PNG, GIF and all their friends, a run for their money. “Optimization” is not just the inclusion of alt-text, but offers multiple responsive options in a file extension and size that is appropriate for the user. Core Web Vitals and all of their page metrics are part of that plan to look at every aspect of web fundamentals (look out devs).Ī major component of slow loading times can be unoptimized images. It wants websites to improve all possible aspects that might reduce loading times, so that every millisecond can be reduced, leading to a better user experience. Google has shown a pattern of disliking pages with slow loading speed across the web. Should you care about WebP image updates to boost SEO?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |